Modern Infostealers Go Viral: Raven Stealer’s Telegram Ops Through a Pen Tester’s Lens

In a recent report from Cybersecurity News, the emergence of Raven Stealer an infostealer using Telegram bots for C2 and exfiltration marks a significant pivot in commodified malware strategy . This threat illustrates how attackers are increasingly leveraging trusted platforms to evade detection and scale attacks.

As a penetration tester, I approach such developments from a dual vantage: analyst and practitioner. Understanding how Raven Stealer operates helps shape our own pen test scenarios and defensive simulations. It informs the next level of real‑world attack modeling and mitigation strategy aligned with enterprise realities.

Why Raven Stealer Matters for Penetration Testing

Raven Stealer reflects a broader trend: AI‑driven cyberattacks and state‑level sophistication are now accessible to commodity tool operators. This malware combines stealth, ease-of-use, and rapid execution-making it a valuable case study for pen testers.

Most disturbingly, Raven integrates credential theft via Telegram C2 and module-driven flexibility, mimicking modern supply‑chain and social media abuse frameworks. These are essential insights when mapping test scenarios around ethical hacking, penetration testing, and ransomware prevention.

Technical Overview: How Raven Stealer Works

Developed in Delphi/C++ with UPX packing for obfuscation. It runs hidden with no visible UI
Utilizes reflective DLL injection to collect passwords, cookies, crypto‑wallet info, autofill data, and session tokens from Chromium-based browsers .
Exfiltrates data directly to a Telegram bot using embedded chat ID and bot token, minimizing network artifacts and blocking detection via traditional proxies .
Maintained and distributed via Telegram channels and GitHub, complete with update logs, builder tools, and modules for low-skill actors .

Attack Flow: Simulation from Infection to Exfil

A threat actor bundles Raven inside phishing mails, cracked software, or watering-hole payloads.
Once executed, Raven injects into browser processes, harvests credentials and session data.
The collected data is compressed and sent via Telegram API to the attacker’s bot.
Attackers on Telegram channels sift through logs, filter by geography or app type-sometimes within minutes .

This flow gives penetration testers a blueprint to simulate similar threat models during red-team tests.

Strategic Insights for Pen Testers

Module-Based Architecture Lessons

Raven’s modular design allows quick customization. Simulating modular malware helps pen testers validate detection logic, defensive telemetry, and incident response procedures.

Leveraging Legitimate Platforms for C2

Tests should evaluate the ability to detect cloud‑based exfiltration over benign traffic, especially via platforms like Telegram. Techniques can include monitoring Bot‑API calls and unusual ZIP file activity in temp directories.

Defense‑Focused Testing

Use dynamic analysis tools (ProcMon, Process Explorer) to detect memory hollowing and browser session theft.
Strengthen tests around token-based authentication: session tokens and cookie manipulation must be simulated and validated under test.

Aligning with Broader Threat Trends

Raven Stealer extends broader cybercrime evolution trends: AI‑driven toolkit proliferation, ransomware prevention via early token detection, supply‑chain vulnerabilities exploited through modular malware, and state‑level mimicry through high‑volume automation.

The malware economy leaks billions of credentials through Telegram channels. A 2024 investigation showed 16 million logs from just 10 Telegram channels flowing to criminals within hours of infection .

Penetration Testing Methodologies Inspired by Raven Stealer

Tooling and Simulations

Burp Suite: simulate phishing mails that deliver Raven-like RATs.
Metasploit / Cobalt Strike: simulate browser injection and reflective DLL attacks.
Shodan: assess public exposure of Telegram bot endpoints; scan for open ports related to phishing infrastructure.

Human Element Testing

Deploy social engineering to assess susceptibility to phishing.
Conduct phishing training evaluating detection of Telegram-based C2 exfil strategies.
Test 2FA resilience: verify that stolen browser sessions still require additional verification steps.

Real‑World Defense Scenarios

Use YARA and custom detection rules to catch UPX-packed Delphi/C++ binaries in temp folders.
Build threat intel detection for outbound connections to api.telegram.org/bot.
Monitor unusual desktop snapshot creation and temporary ZIP archives.
Layer detection through EDR/AV behavioral analytics targeting token theft and memory injection behaviors.

Expert's Insight

As James Knight, Senior Principal at Digital Warfare , put it:“Our IoT and supply‑chain case studies help pen testers simulate hypervisor‑level and system‑level compromise more precisely.”

Summary and Key Takeaways

Raven Stealer exemplifies how modern penetration testing must address malware that blends ease-of-use with stealth.
Key focus areas include browser credential theft, session hijacking, and Telegram-based exfiltration.
Testers should simulate full attack flows: infection, module execution, exfiltration, and post‑infection log misuse.
Defensive measures must incorporate behavioral detection near-temp directories, process injection patterns, and anomalous Telegram API traffic.
Human training and technical controls must converge to address phishing, token misuse, and supply chain-based compromise.

Call to Action

Enhance your defensive posture:

Subscribe to threat intelligence feeds focused on Telegram‑based malware.
Join webinars or conferences for advanced penetration testing frameworks.
Experiment within your lab: build a controlled Raven-like simulation using open-source builders and test detection logic end‑to‑end.

The cyber threat landscape continues evolving- staying vigilant through continuous testing, intelligence updates, and human training is your best defense.

Search This Blog

CyberPro